I attended a writing class recently in Big Sur, CA. I had reasonably high expectations. This writer, I will call Jane, is the editor of a literary press, and I assumed that she was capable of being objective about writing, and was able to evaluate the merit of a piece without being lost in judgment. I was wrong. I write (as I will encourage all of you), to go to the dark places. To dredge up the hauntings of your life, good and bad, and put them on the page. To deepen a character by going to both sides of that character. In the extremes of character definition, ask yourself, if you were writing about Hitler, what were his good qualities? We know the obvious atrocities that he committed, but what was lovable about him? These traits are harder to find in history. I’ve heard he loved his dogs. He was a vegetarian, but he appeared to hunger for human flesh. The complexities of his character make him interesting. Conversely, “What were Mother Teresa’s flaws?” She had to have had them. I haven’t a clue what they were, but I know in her humanness they were there. We all have them.
In the editorial review of my piece this weekend, Jane, the editor, addressed me and the class by saying, “If this story came across my desk I would put it down and stop reading. There is nothing about this character that makes me like him. His behavior is outrageous.” She admitted that the writing was good, but she was judging the content and could not let go of her moral judge to review and assist the writing. I listened with half an ear and scratched a note of my own as if scribbling down what she was saying. “This is why I love writing on the dark side,” I noted.
To be fair, Jane has her own view of the experience. I will be curious to read her blog and find out what she says about this. After her verbal downpour on me she asked, “Everything is okay, isn’t it?”
“No,” I said. “It is not. You were blatantly judging me when you could not get past the content. If you had something to say about the character in terms of definition, perhaps needing a bit more redemption (where the character’s actions and reason for behavior are explained), then I would listen. But you should have been honest and told me that you could not get past the story.”
The piece is about a tormented boy who uses sex to calm his pain. It is a rape scene that I portray. Oscar, the protagonist, is about to carry through the action on this girl and stops himself just short of orgasm. The scene is based on a comment a boy I was dating in college made to me. It was a cruel comment about fat women and making it a game to sleep with them. I took that comment and weaved it into a story and put in the dark parts of myself on both sides. The hunger, the need for love, and simultaneously, the desire to chase it away. The story jumps to life and it is hard to read because it is believable and, in some way, based in truth.
I told Jane that I supported my character, and my story, as I encourage you to write whatever you are experiencing. No matter how black, if you write from a feeling place, it will likely snap off the page and piss off editors like Jane who cannot deny the truth of the story, but are unable to accept the non-traditional writing. I suppose I should be honored in the 21st century to be able to offend someone in a simple page of writing. In a day where reality TV does everything short of live fornication, and sexting and you-name-it is available for public consumption. Because I wrote honestly and from the heart, she could not fault that. Write from that place. You can’t go wrong.